Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paulat
Without discussing content, Noonan STILL missed the purpose of the speech.

So, let us turn the question around. Could you please tell us what you believe to have been the vision that Bush was trying to set forth, and then indicate what "content" supports your interpretation of that vision.

172 posted on 01/21/2005 7:05:36 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson
So, let us turn the question around. Could you please tell us what you believe to have been the vision that Bush was trying to set forth, and then indicate what "content" supports your interpretation of that vision.

No.

177 posted on 01/21/2005 7:09:07 AM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

To: AndyJackson

Ok Andy, let me try to explain it to you. During first half of the 20th Century US foreign policy was focused on security of the US. The last half of the 20th century foreign policy focused on spreading democracy, defeating communism. Bush has married the two policies. US security DEPENDS on spreading freedom. Get it?


248 posted on 01/21/2005 8:05:07 AM PST by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson