It is not 'disagreement' with the President, nor committing some imaginary 'cardinal sin.'
It is that we think her first opinion of the speech was right, and that this revised (for whatever reason) one is wrong.
Is there another article she has written? I'm lost. Or, are you talking about her comments on TV afterwards? I haven't seen another article, so I can't compare and respond. I did see her afterwards, briefly. I didn't pick up anything extraordinary.
It is not 'disagreement' with the President, nor committing some imaginary 'cardinal sin.'
It is that very condescending attitude I am referring to. There have been several uncalled for, presumptuous and snide remarks made on this thread about Noonan. There have been numerous caddy remarks made on this thread, and others, to people who disagree with the President. I could careless. My mind won't be changed by belittling comments and I am not entering into silly, petty arguments that are not only silly but embarrassing. Debate... that is another story.
It is that we think her first opinion of the speech was right, and that this revised (for whatever reason) one is wrong.
She has her opinion, and obviously you have yours. And, I have mine. Which, concerning the speech, I have not addressed. It is the name calling of conservatives to other conservatives who disagree that I find disconcerting. This is hardly McCain.
FRegards---EM