Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: denydenydeny
but this piece reminds me that she didn't write Reagan's "tear down this wall" speech, and I think she found that one a bit "grating" as well.

I agree and you may have put your finger on it.

I don't think she's jealous as others have speculated. I think she's giving her honest opinion, which just happens to be wrong. I am willing to be that she may have thought that Reagan line was grating at the time because, as is her problem here, she did not think it was an attainable goal.

I think she hasn't taken the Bush Doctrine seriously to date. This speech was an affirmation of and more explicit expounding upon that Doctrine which was first invoked after 9/11.

267 posted on 01/21/2005 5:59:24 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper

I love Noonan.

I read her stuff all the time, and find it to be --- what?
Sometimes insightful, sometimes thoughtful, always a little bit dreamy -- sort of train of thought.
And Sometimes dead wrong.


She's dead wrong on this.


268 posted on 01/21/2005 6:05:41 AM PST by 9999lakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper

"I don't think she's jealous as others have speculated. I think she's giving her honest opinion, which just happens to be wrong. I am willing to be that she may have thought that Reagan line was grating at the time because, as is her problem here, she did not think it was an attainable goal."

The interesting thing here, her writing is completely opposite of her "LIVE" response right after the speech, however, she did say she needed to 'think about it'.


275 posted on 01/21/2005 6:15:15 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson