Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEG33; Miss Marple; Caipirabob

Amusing, no? that she goes over the top in her critique of Bush's speech supposedly going over the top?

I agree with you, MEG; Bush made a thoughtful, determined, historic break with the past in this speech, wherein he makes our security and our idealism one and the same. Now it is not our policy to ignore the cancer of humanity in chains, while we prate on and bleed in wars about "security" alone, because our security is harmed by such, and because it is morally wrong to do so.

All he really did was recognize and highlight THE TRUTH of what goes on in this world, and his determination to deal with it on that truthful basis.

I heard her initial reaction, and she seemed sold that this was America at it's most traditionally optimistic best. She said Europeans say there's nothing we can do about the way of things in the world, while America always says, yes, maybe there is.
Something happened, in between there, perhaps to tick her off.

Whatever it was, no excuses, her piece is bunk. Coming from me, someone who has admired most of her efforts in the past.


220 posted on 01/21/2005 3:19:33 AM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: txrangerette

I am a fan of Peggy's most of the time..This just floors me...


221 posted on 01/21/2005 3:23:05 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

To: MEG33; Miss Marple; Caipirabob; All
(Apologies for the spacing problem in my original post.)

Amusing, no? that she goes over the top in her critique of Bush's speech supposedly going over the top?

I agree with you, MEG; Bush made a thoughtful, determined, historic break with the past in this speech, wherein he makes our security and our idealism one and the same. Now it is not our policy to ignore the cancer of humanity in chains, while we prate on and bleed in wars about "security" alone, because our security is harmed by such, and because it is morally wrong to do so.

All he really did was recognize and highlight THE TRUTH of what goes on in this world, and his determination to deal with it on that truthful basis.

I heard her initial reaction, and she seemed sold that this was America at its most traditionally optimistic best. She said Europeans say there's nothing we can do about the way of things in the world, while America always says, yes, maybe there is.

Something happened, in between there, perhaps to tick her off.

Whatever it was, no excuses, her piece is bunk. Coming from me, someone who has admired most of her efforts in the past.

226 posted on 01/21/2005 3:37:40 AM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson