Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
And here, in looking for that which distinguishes life from non-life/death – when both consist of the same “stuff” – the biologist/chemist approach is characterization, the mathematician’s approach is mathematical structure.

I appreciate your oft-repeated sentiment along those lines. But, your shannon-communication definition of life, even if simple and elegant by itself, does not provide a clear or sharp demarcation between life and non-life. And that has nothing to do with a limitation of math nor a limitation of the physical world or a physical discription, nor, as you imply, a limited ability to communicate about it. It's quite simply that the model doesn't fit the data completely. Examples are simple organic molecules and artifical life systems. At any rate, this model brings one much closer to the fringes of life and greatly shortens the distance from life to non-life than most biological definitions. It's far easier to conceptualize, using your definition, how spontaneous generation of communication can occur in an molecular soup.

...Hence, the difficulty in our making a “connection.” Perhaps we ought to quit trying?

That's generous of you. Please feel welcome to jump in, again, any time. In any case, thank you for your posts.

546 posted on 01/22/2005 10:46:31 PM PST by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies ]


To: Nebullis; betty boop
Thank you for your reply! It has been a pleasure chatting with you again - seems like a long time since our last encounter.

It's far easier to conceptualize, using your definition, how spontaneous generation of communication can occur in an molecular soup.

We are at a point in the previous discussion where we are both simply repeating ourselves, but you raise a new and interesting issue in the above comment.

When we were investigating abiogenesis using Shannon (which did give it a level playing field as you suggest) - we surmissed that there was no origin for information (defined by Shannon and paraphrased "successful communication") in space/time. We had looked at Kauffman and dismissed Maxwell's demon but we hadn't yet considered string theory or geometry.

It sounds like you have a idea how communications might have been bootstrapped into a primordial soup or primordial pizza. I'm very, very curious what you have in mind!

548 posted on 01/22/2005 11:24:25 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson