Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: My2Cents
...evolutionists should have no problem with the introduction of "intelligent design" or raw "creationism" into the schools...

I certainly don't, so long as such metaphysical conjectures aren't taught as science.

34 posted on 01/20/2005 1:22:02 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv; Strategerist
"..as long as such metaphysical conjectures aren't taught as science."

Riiiight. I think the conjecture of those suffering mental confusion as a result of cognitive dissonance should be taught instead:

"In spite of the fact that most mutations are harmful and 2/3 of all mutations are recessive, we evolved because natural selection chose helpful mutations by eliminating those which are harmful. We believe that natural selection can eliminate recessive mutations, and we know that the proof for our belief is out there, we just haven't found it yet."

284 posted on 01/20/2005 7:54:40 PM PST by Matchett-PI (Today's DemocRATS are either religious moral relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

"...evolutionists should have no problem with the introduction of "intelligent design" or raw "creationism" into the schools...
I certainly don't, so long as such metaphysical conjectures aren't taught as science."

Yeah, ID and creationism should be taught in a class called
"How to misinterpret the Bible".


776 posted on 02/20/2005 5:54:00 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson