I believe you are mistaken. We've been over this a ton of times. The paper was reviewed by more than one person; all with Ph.D.'s. It followed the same process as the other papers. The only reason the Journal distanced itself was because the evo's went ape-**** and caused a firestorm. You better get your facts straight - I'm sure Dr. Meyer wouldn't appreciate you concocting a just-so story at his expense.