Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sevry

those are two components of the explanatory theory of the mechanism, yes.

there is also the explanatory theory of the evidence, which led to the development of several evolutionary theories, most of which disproven by science, one of which generally supported and expanded by science.

but this is well beside the point: I have -by your posts- been led to believe that there is no valid purpose served in even attempting discourse with you.


145 posted on 01/20/2005 2:49:25 PM PST by King Prout (trolls survive through a form of gastroenterotic oroborosity, a brownian "perpepetual movement")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: King Prout
explanatory theory of the evidence

The 'record'. How did one end up here, and not there, what uplift, what stream, what flood, etc?

But that's not evolution. You have the fact, however you define it, whatever you mean by it. And you have my question - do you have a theory, or some alternative theories, that might explain how it came to be, and continues to this day (supposedly)? Or is it just an irreducible fact, and that's as far as we go? No natural selection? No chance? No mutation? No populations? No genetic drift and the like? Evolution is just a fact - see - I drop this apple (just like that)?

154 posted on 01/20/2005 3:04:04 PM PST by sevry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson