[narby]

In a specific species, these changes don't occur serially one after another. They occur in parallel, which massivly increases the rate of change.

And examine the statistics of the time it takes for one "species" to evolve into another. If that takes a million years (which it probably doesn't), then after 1 million years you have two species. After 2 million years, you have 4. After 3 million you have 8.

At 8 million years, you have 256 species. At 16 million years, you have 64 thousand species. The earth is a couple orders of magnitude older than that, need I go on?

The number of species grows exponentially, and any problem you have with the statistics goes away.

Trust me, this has been looked into by serious folks who have researched this completly, and there is no statistical problem with Evolution.

You have been misinformed by people who have agendas. Sorry.

[Idisarthur]

I read what narby has to say. Sounds like he is asserting some items. Savagemom beware of false assertions. As well, teach your kiddos to guard against this bullying tactic.

I would guess that narby is also the type that says there are no statistical errors with the fossil records.