"Why is adaptation incompatible with creationism?" Adaptation is the alteration of that which already exists in response to an un-anticipated change in conditions. When we are faced with new conditions that were not anticipated, we as humans adapt. Creationism however teaches that the Creator has no need to 'adapt' because un-anticipated changes are non-existent. The Creator does not 'adapt', but rather decides to alter the conditions to suit the inhabitant, or the inhabitant to suit the condition. Why is an evolutionary process incompatible with God? The evolutionary process IS God to evolutionists. If you believe in the God of the bible, then you must believe in the supernatural, which according to evolutionists is anti-science. |
"The evolutionary process IS God to evolutionists."
Not true. I believe in evolution, but I don't worship that concept (or anything else, for that matter)
"If you believe in the God of the bible, then you must believe in the supernatural, which according to evolutionists is anti-science. '"
My basic problem with Creationism is really the same flaw I have with 'Big Bang' evolution - Neither tackles the 'where did the mass of the universe that God used for Creation or that went BANG came from? Law of Conservation of Matter says matter is neither created nor destroyed. Both ideas are in violation of this principle.