You offer "evolution" as an entity. I mentioned "evolution defense", which is a man-made (and faith-based, I might add) process. You're changing the subject. Platitudes and canned buzzwords do not suffice.
evolution is science, which by definition, cares nothing about theology
"Science" may not. But evo-worshipers do. It has become their theology, and they pervert science by supporting it in dogmatic fashion.
If man acepted 'magic' as a scientific explanation for natural phenomena, we'd all still be throwing spears at each other.
non-sequitor. Surely you can do better than that. The subject was ID.
"You offer "evolution" as an entity. "
I offer evolution as a tested scientific theory. The scientific community agrees with me 100%, so what do you base these accusations on?
Here are some bold statements from a good portion of the scientific community: