Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus

I was told 30 years ago that the reason the nuclear merchant ship NS Savannah was retired was that she practically glowed in the dark -- and didn't make money, either.

She was introduced with old style cargo handling just as containerized shipping was becoming the standard. They tried lashing containers to the deck but was still not profitable. If you get a chance, vist this ship, it is interesting. If it glowed in the dark, we tourist wouldn't be allowed to visit it.....or would we?


6 posted on 01/17/2005 6:15:40 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Doohickey

Ping


13 posted on 01/17/2005 8:28:31 AM PST by El Gran Salseron ( The replies by this poster are meant for self-amusement only. Read at your own risk. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PeterPrinciple
If you get a chance, vist this ship, it is interesting. If it glowed in the dark, we tourist wouldn't be allowed to visit it.....or would we?

I thought the Savannah had been broken up.

On second thought, it wasn't Savannah that I heard that "glow-in-the-dark" comment about, it was the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Lenin. Again, scuttlebutt, but that's what I heard.

Tom Clancy said something in Hunt for Red October about that problem, and how it limited the career lives of American nuclear submarines.

15 posted on 01/17/2005 11:44:00 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson