Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
Figures. Lowenstein was Buffett's biographer, and shares his 'socialism for the little people' idealsm

Conservative economists say the figure is irrelevant: if Social Security didn't exist, people would save more. This may be true of economists, but what about the rest of us?

No...we're all too stupid. We need government to do it for us! Say, I need the government to mow my lawn properly and keep my weight down, too. Can they send someone right over?

The argument illustrates the ideological agenda of those who favor privatization: they want to change people's behavior.

This lack of argument illustrates the ideological agenda of those who favor federal Ponzi schemes: they want to redistribute wealth from the haves to the stupid.

8 posted on 01/16/2005 10:11:24 PM PST by Choose Ye This Day (Socialism failed. Bush won. Wellstone is dead. Get over it, DUmmies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Choose Ye This Day

The haves are smarter and deserve to have adequate retirement income. The have-nots are stupid and don't.


15 posted on 04/17/2005 3:09:22 PM PDT by Mill John Stuart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson