To: prairiebreeze
I don't think that, after slicing the throats of the infidels, the muslim scumbags would be averse to picking up any spare spending money lying about the house.
607 posted on
01/17/2005 7:49:48 AM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
I don't think that, after slicing the throats of the infidels, the muslim scumbags would be averse to picking up any spare spending money lying about the house.They never have been averse in the past, and as the original rules of the killer muslim gang very clearly define it, officially and in writing, one-fifth of all loot belongs to the prophet. They get to keep the rest.
609 posted on
01/17/2005 7:54:21 AM PST by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
To: dead
"the muslim scumbags would be averse to picking up any spare spending money lying about the house.
Why would they be adverse to that?
612 posted on
01/17/2005 8:45:32 AM PST by
monday
To: dead
I don't think that, after slicing the throats of the infidels, the muslim scumbags would be averse to picking up any spare spending money lying about the house.Or the cops took the money and jewels.
658 posted on
01/17/2005 1:13:38 PM PST by
JTHomes
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson