To: ddantas
English is a awful language to learn. ...Latin-based language, like Italian, Spanish, or Portuguese...Their grammatical rules are typically much more elegant.
Maybe so, but it is efficient. Next time you look at any document printed in several languages, take a look at the lengths of each translation. English is always the shortest.
30 posted on
01/15/2005 3:27:25 AM PST by
StACase
To: StACase
Maybe so, but it is efficient. Next time you look at any document printed in several languages, take a look at the lengths of each translation. English is always the shortest. Sometimes.
I used to come. I used to see. I used to conquer........English
Venia. Veia. Vencia................Spanish
46 posted on
01/17/2005 8:48:26 AM PST by
Polybius
To: StACase
English is always the shortest. Have you ever looked at Semetic languages like Hebrew or Arabic? Not only do they omit the "be" verb in the present tense, but they also don't have vowels written out. As a result, text in those languages is almost always shorter than English. Of course, they are horrifically complicated in other ways.
55 posted on
01/22/2005 2:48:02 PM PST by
ChicagoHebrew
(Hell exists, it is real. It's a quiet green meadow populated entirely by Arab goat herders.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson