Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ddantas

Maybe so, but it is efficient. Next time you look at any document printed in several languages, take a look at the lengths of each translation. English is always the shortest.

30 posted on 01/15/2005 3:27:25 AM PST by StACase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: StACase
Maybe so, but it is efficient. Next time you look at any document printed in several languages, take a look at the lengths of each translation. English is always the shortest.

Sometimes.

I used to come. I used to see. I used to conquer........English

Venia. Veia. Vencia................Spanish

46 posted on 01/17/2005 8:48:26 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: StACase
English is always the shortest.

Have you ever looked at Semetic languages like Hebrew or Arabic? Not only do they omit the "be" verb in the present tense, but they also don't have vowels written out. As a result, text in those languages is almost always shorter than English. Of course, they are horrifically complicated in other ways.

55 posted on 01/22/2005 2:48:02 PM PST by ChicagoHebrew (Hell exists, it is real. It's a quiet green meadow populated entirely by Arab goat herders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson