"Faith" is an unquestioning belief, while "theory" is a proposed explanation. In making evolution an unquestionable doctrine the judge has elevated it from a theory to a matter of faith and, as such, has violated the establishment clause.
What 'establishment clause'?
In the Constitution?
How did a 'Judge' violate a clause that only 'Congress' could propose?
Judges do not make laws.
They interpret them.
And this Judge is wrong!