Anyway, I agree. Weepy Boxer going after Rice is going to be a laugher. Kinda like having Curly of the Three Stooges debate against Ann Coulter.
18 posted on 01/14/2005 6:39:56 AM PST by Enterprise ("Dance with the Devil by the Pale Moonlight" - Islam compels you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
I'll give the answer to one question that the Stupid left keeps asking thata will shut their mouths on the subject.
And that is the one about giving us false information on the WMD in Iraq.
It would go like this:
'Mrs. Boxer it has been wildly reported for the past two years that this Administration intentionally used faulty information to push us going to war.
If you remember Mrs. Boxer we were subjected to the Horror of 3,000 Americans being Killed on American soil just before that. Why? Well let me tell you bluntly.
It's because you folks right here in this Body and the House, along with Democrat President all thru the 1990's that stripped the Intellegence community of the Proper funding and legal Authority to infiltrate these Areas.
We were not allowed to put our own people in there. The Clinton Administration flat refused to Capture folks like OBL, or deal with terrorists in other parts of the world. We were not allowed to spend the capital to use other sources to get the information we needed to be 1,000 percent clear of what Hussain had and was working on.
Remember Mrs. Boxer, we can only go by the Intellegence we were given. We operated under the belief that the information we had was valid and verified. If you remember the British also had the same information that they gathered independently of our sources. So it wasn't as has been suggested as manufactured.
One last note Mrs. Boxer, I did a little digging and have failed to find ONE SITTING US Senator from the Democrat Party that critisized President Clinton when he bombed an Asprin Factory in the Sudan, or a tent and a few Camels in the Desert or his sending us to War in Kosovo under the same less than perfect Intel.
Or for that matter his bombing of Iraq when ever it appreared some sorrid detail was about to surface about his affair with a 20 Year old Child in the Oval Office. So I take your comments with a grain of salt because from this seat it sure appears more partisan than that of concern.'
Here's a good answer to this question:
Why did we divert valuable resources and intelligence personnel to Iraq, taking them away from Afghanistan and the pursuit of Osama bin Laden?
Hey, idiot: read Tommy Franks' book. We didn't.
But carry on.