Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/13/2005 1:41:38 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: pabianice
>The bad news is varied. First, we have Speilberg... Tom Cruise takes the lead again ...


2 posted on 01/13/2005 1:44:39 PM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

That picture looks like a cross between the Borg from Star Trek: and the future world depicted in the Matrix.


3 posted on 01/13/2005 1:45:06 PM PST by Pyro7480 ("All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Well, the sketch looks interesting...thx for posting this.


4 posted on 01/13/2005 1:46:13 PM PST by weenie (Islam is as "...dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog." -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
The links and article seem to confuse the Spielberg version with the Pendragon version. No offense, but while the Pendragon version is "faithful" to the novel and set in 1890's England, it looks like a bad 70's TV movie. Hopefully the Spielberg version will at least be a fun two hours of mindless summer action.
5 posted on 01/13/2005 1:46:18 PM PST by aegiscg47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

When will Hollywierd state to do original pictures again? Some movies should not be remade.


6 posted on 01/13/2005 1:47:33 PM PST by TXBSAFH (Never underestimate the power of human stupidity--Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Let me see, Spielberg+Hollywood, I bet the Martians will turn out to be Ditto-head conservatives.


7 posted on 01/13/2005 1:48:12 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
well of someone who read the book recently (a couple of weeks ago, i try and alternate between a classic and a fun book)

I was actually pretty shocked (i saw the movie ;) ) it was completely different. I sort of liked the book better though (honestly it could have gone either way)

Tom cruise...first off...he's too pretty for the role...there is no love story in the book. The main character has a wife that he mentions every once in a while..but thats it.
Also cruise is an action star....war or the worlds isn't exactly actiony. The lead character is sort of a soft writer type (well he is a writer and the book is written from is perspective) Tom cruise isn't a writer type...For this one i could see someone like Tim robins (yes liberal POS but good actor), or even Kevin spacey, Morgan freeman would also be a good choice. No wonder he can't "get into the role" Thats my two cents. I think the movie is going to be a let down to people who read the book, and if lean towards the movie then they will just give it a face lift and hope they get a hit. Then find another idea give that a face lift and repeat process until the Martians do come down and try and kill us all
9 posted on 01/13/2005 1:51:38 PM PST by tfecw (dolphins are the spawn of evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
The chances of anything coming from Mars

Was a million to one, they said...

10 posted on 01/13/2005 1:52:36 PM PST by AzSteven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

It looks from the picture that he's stealing an idea from the Matrix.


13 posted on 01/13/2005 1:58:56 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
What happened to Spielberg, anyway? His movies used to be fun, without the preaching. In CloseEncounters, the government conspiracy types were actually the good guys trying to make contact with the aliens. In ET, their reaction to ET's presence is understandable and they even try to save his life when ET appears to be dying.

Something happened in the '90's. Maybe it was the string of flops he had after his early mega-successes-maybe it's because he has kids now, or has just gotten older and more cynical, but his movies seem to be more about being PC and less about the kind of old-fashioned entertainment that he once wanted to revive. At least with Ron Howard you get a guy who might be a lib but who still knows how to make entertaining movies.

17 posted on 01/13/2005 2:01:12 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (Conservatism pays off. Liberalism just wants to be paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

So will Slim Whitman save the day in this one?


18 posted on 01/13/2005 2:01:44 PM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Tom Cruise = me no go


19 posted on 01/13/2005 2:02:00 PM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
I love the cover art for the album.


20 posted on 01/13/2005 2:02:23 PM PST by labowski ("The Dude Abideth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
I must be on an entirely different wavelength than Spielberg. I have not liked any of his movies since the one about the runaway truck.

I especially thought ET was awful. Also noted that PC seems to permeate his films.

Also don't like HG Wells. He has great ideas but his books are a little hard to get into. Jules Verne is far better.

29 posted on 01/13/2005 2:18:10 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pride in the USA

Keepin' an eye out for this one


30 posted on 01/13/2005 2:18:10 PM PST by lonevoice (Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

In the remake, all alien heat rays will be replaced by walkie-talkies.


32 posted on 01/13/2005 2:20:48 PM PST by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Tom Cruise takes the lead again...

Huh?? Wasn't Rip Taylor available?

I'm sorry. A "man's man" need to carry this role, not 'Blue Boy.'

36 posted on 01/13/2005 2:32:06 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
In order to not offend them, the Martians in the story have been replaced with neo-nazis.
38 posted on 01/13/2005 2:34:02 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Blackwell for Governor 2006: hated by the 'Rats, feared by the RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

I'm hoping for the best, but I kind of lost faith in Spielberg after A.I. Blech!


45 posted on 01/13/2005 2:47:32 PM PST by Thoro (I don't want a rolex watch already! Stop spamming me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

One of my favorite albums was Jeff Wayne's musical version of War of the Worlds. Anyone ever heard of this one? Sort of a rock-version of the story.


52 posted on 01/13/2005 2:54:20 PM PST by spiffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson