Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gabz
However the rest of the sentence is correct: "Such bans are tantamount to precluding peaceable assemblage in that those who may choose to smoke would have to separate themselves from the assembly."

Whether to smoke or assemble, they'll have to make a choice. Go naked or assemble, be a public nuisance or assemble, .... Life is full of choices.

16 posted on 01/13/2005 12:15:26 PM PST by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: newgeezer

If a smoker wants to smoke, my answer to him is, "Certainly,BUT SMOKE THE DAMN WEED OUTSIDE. I DON'T NEED CANCER FROM YOUR BUTT."


19 posted on 01/13/2005 12:19:10 PM PST by zoosha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

I own the business and I invite you in, why should I not be able to enjoy the company of folks that choose to smoke if I so desire.

Additionally, these smoking bans FORCE the owner of the PRIVATE property to have to exit his PRIVATE property if he happens to be a tobacco smoker.

if you don't like being around smokers, find an establishment that doesn't permit it, or talk to the owner of the ones that do.........keep the government out of it. It may be something you enjoy next.


49 posted on 01/13/2005 1:09:49 PM PST by Gabz (Anti-smoker gnatzies...small minds buzzing in your business..............SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson