Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDGE RULES EVOLUTION DISCLAIMERS "UNCONSTITUTIONAL"
ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 01/13/2005 8:33:37 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 741-743 next last
To: steplock
and stop forcibly if necessary any illegal and unconstitutional interdiction into our liberties by those who claim themselves our 'masters'!

Sounds like you're ready to lock and load.

61 posted on 01/13/2005 9:10:45 AM PST by Brig_Gen_George_P_Harrison_CSA (Deo Vindice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Been trying to get it, but reports PDF damaged.


62 posted on 01/13/2005 9:14:32 AM PST by 4CJ (Laissez les bon FReeps rouler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Unfortunately, the 10'th is a dead letter, and the 14'th isn't - hence the current state of affairs.

You're absolutely correct. The 14th Amendment gives the Federal government the constitutional basis to intervene in state affairs. That amendment has to be repealed before any real progress is to be made in rolling back the Federal leviathan.

63 posted on 01/13/2005 9:15:54 AM PST by Brig_Gen_George_P_Harrison_CSA (Deo Vindice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Brig_Gen_George_P_Harrison_CSA

Indeed. Or, at the very least, reinterpreted in such a way as to be less conducive to federal intervention in every single aspect of state actions.


64 posted on 01/13/2005 9:20:10 AM PST by general_re (How come so many of the VKs have been here six months or less?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: writer33
Wake up and smell the Cafe Ole!

Uh... that's café au lait. It means "coffee with milk".

65 posted on 01/13/2005 9:20:53 AM PST by Politicalities (http://www.politicalities.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Cannot read it. I get a pdf file damage message.

If you are able to download and read it, will you be kind enough to start a new thread with the decision text, by converting the pdf to text?

66 posted on 01/13/2005 9:21:24 AM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I've been around long enough to remember the other side of this when the fight was to get evolution printed in the schoolbooks in the first place. There were disclaimer requirements then too.

One thing about pendulums, they inevitably swing in the other direction until someone figures out a way to freeze them.


67 posted on 01/13/2005 9:22:49 AM PST by contemplator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM

I think the sticker should stay but should address both sides of the coin.

"Creationism is a religious belief with no basis in empirical science, and evolution is a scientific theory, not a fact."


68 posted on 01/13/2005 9:23:19 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Federal control of State schools makes the wishes of the citizens of that obsolete..
The Feds overiding state citizens on ANYTHING is a travesty..

For ALL citizens are citizens of a state not citizens of America. America has NO citizens, only States do.. The Federal government is a mental construct, the states are tangible real entities.. Its unconstitutional for the federal government to have citizens.. American citizens is also a mental construct.. for only states have citizens..

For the federal government to have citizens is an attack on the concept of a republic.. making it a democracy.. which of course is MOB RULE.. ruled by mobsters all mobbed up.. with territorys.. NOT SOVERIGN STATES..

69 posted on 01/13/2005 9:24:05 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Judge Rules That the Letter "M" is Illegal. All publications with this illegal letter between L and N must be burned or otherwise destroyed co*pletely. Ruling based on application of supre*acy clause as the now banned letter was code for a Federally banned substance.

Supre*e Court expected to uphold!

70 posted on 01/13/2005 9:24:18 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: hosepipe

The John Jay, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison fought Thomas Jefferson over that very concept a long time ago. The Federalists won. The papers (both sides of the argument) make for an awesome, mind opening read.


72 posted on 01/13/2005 9:28:01 AM PST by contemplator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Do they have a section on creationism in the textbook?


73 posted on 01/13/2005 9:29:09 AM PST by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
Thank you for posting the text that's on the sticker. That is helpful, and I agree with you that there isn't a hook in there anywhere for a ruling of "endorsement", whatever that it.

But the deal works like this: the judicial activists merely need to issue decisions ruling that a certain act has violated the Constitution because it "endorsed" religion. Those rulings are then used to pave the way for other rulings. They are building a wall, and they don't need to use reality to slap the blocks together.

This will soon lead to rulings that establish guilt by reason of "intent to endorse", which will then then to prosecution for thought crimes.

74 posted on 01/13/2005 9:29:47 AM PST by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has never led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
"Congress needs to abolish federal courts."

Seems to me it's been done before.

75 posted on 01/13/2005 9:31:08 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george wythe

Strict adherance to his logic would call for the removal of all trademarks and copyright designations as they would be "endorsements."


76 posted on 01/13/2005 9:33:32 AM PST by Old Professer (When the fear of dying no longer obtains no act is unimaginable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

This textbook is rated "E?"


77 posted on 01/13/2005 9:34:51 AM PST by Old Professer (When the fear of dying no longer obtains no act is unimaginable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thanks for the ping! IMHO, this is another form of judicial activism and needs to be prosecuted all the way to the Supremes.


78 posted on 01/13/2005 9:35:25 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
...whether or not they pulled it out of Kings 7:23.

Would that be First or Second Kings?


79 posted on 01/13/2005 9:38:13 AM PST by rdb3 (Real men don't whine. It's 2005 and everyone's gonna feel it this year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Politicalities
>>Wake up and smell the Cafe Ole!<<

Uh... that's café au lait. It means "coffee with milk".

Maybe he was having coffee with a matador...

80 posted on 01/13/2005 9:41:27 AM PST by WildHorseCrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 741-743 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson