Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CouncilofTrent
Then what of the inclusion of these texts in the original King James Bible?"

The King James Version of 1611 was never authorized and was not a true version.

It was based on Erasmus Greek Text (TR). Revised in 1629, 1638, 1653, 1701, 1762, 1769, and several more times unofficially. Over 100,000 changes were made.

It unfortunately depended to some degree on the Bishop's Bible and included some anachronistic Latinisms and other problems which eventually had to be corrected.

I find it hilarious that you would ask such a question and totally IGNORE the implications of what I wrote in my previous post.

You have shown yourself to be quite the unserious person.

I'll bail out of your boat now. I get bored riding in circles with intellectually dishonest one-armed boat rowers after a while.

272 posted on 01/16/2005 5:59:33 PM PST by Matchett-PI (Today's DemocRATS are either religious moral relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]


To: Matchett-PI

Prove I am intellectually dishonest. Also, to say that I am "unserious" is hypocritical, judging from your refusal to debate further.


273 posted on 01/16/2005 6:19:06 PM PST by CouncilofTrent (Quo Primum...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson