Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lexinom
  1. Judge Bridge will be hearing the election contest after Judge Small recused.
  2. This is not the first election contest that Judge Bridge has heard.

Judge John Bridge annulled and set aside the 2000 election for Wenatchee Mayor, finding that Gary Schoessler was not eligible because he failed to meet the residency requirements.

Judge John Bridge was meticulous in his findings of fact and law. He enumerated 90 separate findings of fact and 15 conclusions of law. His thoroughness may be one reason why the WA State Supreme Court unanimously upheld the election annulment.

Another notable fact is that Judge John Bridge did not delay the proceedings. The election contest was filed December 3, 1999 and the ruling was filed January 7, 2000. Also notable was that the WA Supreme Court immediately accepted review and affirmed on April 20, 2000. Almost 5 months from the filing to the final decision.

91 posted on 01/14/2005 4:49:38 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Publius

Sounds like HE belongs on the State Supreme Court.


92 posted on 01/14/2005 5:01:06 PM PST by Lexinom (www.revotewa.com - Go DINO! www.illegitimategovernor.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Publius
Judge John Bridge was meticulous in his findings of fact and law. He enumerated 90 separate findings of fact and 15 conclusions of law. His thoroughness may be one reason why the WA State Supreme Court unanimously upheld the election annulment.

i remember reading the opinion. It was a pretty strait-forward case and there really wasn't even a little bit of wiggle room. If Bridges applies the unambiguous wording of the election contest statutes to the facts of this case, a revote is a foregone conclusion. there really is no other option, especially with all the public attention being paid to it. The state SC will be unanimus in ruling for a revote.

93 posted on 01/14/2005 6:08:42 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson