The DOD actually seems to be combining several approaches to ASW: New unmanned and manned sensor/weapon platforms, "persistent" surface and underwater sensors and even unmanned underwater "weapon pods" placed strategically around the world are all in the works. The point is that a meaningful ASW response is not exclusively about new submarines.I think that you would agree with me that these sorts of things need to be given greater priority, include new subs, of course.
I would point out that the new subs would be every similar to AIP diesels but would be nuclear. With all electric drives and distributed jet pulsors, these boats would have the same sort of signatures that the newer boats out there have but with much greater power and flexibility.
If current trends continue, war with China must surely come. perhaps even the existence of these systems, and the will to use them, will deter China.
"The point is that a meaningful ASW response is not exclusively about new submarines. I think that you would agree with me..."
Indeed I would. If the US goes ahead with supersonic torpedo development, what do you think its mission would be? Is there a need for it? The advantage (beats the detection signal back to the target) is substantial, but in what scenario would it make sense? Thanks.