[Liz]

What if there is evidence of (Clinton-Berger) collusion with foreign governments at the expense of national security?

I've always been skeptical that 911 was planned so thoroughly for so long and that no one claims to have known about it. When Berger was asked about it by a Congressional committee shortly after, he said it probably took "three months" to plan (right after Bush took office)...............which is ridiculous in the extreme. Berger was CYA'ing himself and Clinton b/c they know 911 was planned under their watch. And now they're trying to cover it up by stealing documents that prove it.

[Miss Marple]

Good point. Let's remember Clinton showing up in New York and walking the streets right after it happened, handing out hugs and tears. Given your statement, it creeps me out.

[demlosers]

This is a great thread. I doubt these documents needed to be "Top Secret," but received the high security rating because they contained embarrassing information for the Clinton administration. A not so uncommon practice to use a high security tag in government to cover up mistakes, incompetence, malfeasance, or as I suspect, treasonous acts against U.S. national security.

Bookmarking thread :)

[Howlin]

When Berger was asked about it by a Congressional committee shortly after, he said it probably took "three months" to plan (right after Bush took office)...............which is ridiculous in the extreme. Berger was CYA'ing himself and Clinton b/c they know 911 was planned under their watch. And now they're trying to cover it up by stealing documents that prove it.

There you go.