To: Liz
What is most interesting is WHY Bergerfelt compelled to do this. Was it on his behalf or someone else's? Was he covering up for security goofs or intentional malfeasance? And who else is involved...Clintons, DNC, or foreign governments?
To: Miss Marple
Berger was covering up the fact that the Clinton Administration refused to deal with Bin Laden.
27 posted on
01/12/2005 12:49:10 AM PST by
kcvl
To: Miss Marple
......WHY Berger felt compelled to do this. Was it on his behalf or someone else's? Was he covering up for security goofs or intentional malfeasance? And who else is involved...Clintons, DNC, or foreign......... Great questions. I would venture to say Berger was goaded by some of each......bedeviled by some more than others.....but mostly to coverup his and Clinton's incompetent and corrupt-ridden tracks.
32 posted on
01/12/2005 1:01:23 AM PST by
Liz
(Wise men are instructed by reason; lesser men, by experience; the ignorant, by necessity. Cicero)
To: Miss Marple
Do I detect the faith aroma of an on-coming case of Arkancide...or two?
180 posted on
01/12/2005 8:21:20 AM PST by
Redleg Duke
(Pass Tort Reform Now! Make the bottom clean for the catfish!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson