Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hinterlander

Ann's actually an annoying/boring speaker. I alsways prefer the less sarcastic/egotistical and more crucial Michelle Malkin. Much more substantive.


15 posted on 01/11/2005 12:34:31 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: montag813

Its not an either\or thing. I love 'em both because they believe what I believe and I believe what they believe, and I love to hear them talk about those beliefs. If they're both attractive, so much the better, but it's their principles that attract me.


19 posted on 01/11/2005 12:46:49 PM PST by Sir Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: montag813
"Ann's actually an annoying/boring speaker. I always prefer the less sarcastic/egotistical and more crucial Michelle Malkin. Much more substantive."

I agree.......Ann is more in her element spewing out one liners and such. I know she is very very intelligent but I prefer to hear others who don't have to deliver invective and such every other sentence......she is more a hit woman than a eloquent purveyor of the truth
20 posted on 01/11/2005 12:49:23 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: montag813

"Ann's actually an annoying/boring speaker. I alsways prefer the less sarcastic/egotistical and more crucial Michelle Malkin. Much more substantive"

I agree.

Moreover:

1) Michelle is pretty
2) Michelle is a mother
3) Michelle is married
4) Michelle is against illegal aliens


21 posted on 01/11/2005 12:57:00 PM PST by not-a-neocon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson