[NYC GOP Chick]

--If you had bothered to SEE the movie, you'd realize that Moore wasn't portraying Saddam's Iraq as "a nice place to live" so much as he was showing what daily life was like in Baghdad before the war began. He had several images of people going about their daily business: children playing; people congregating in public places; people living their daily lives WITHOUT WAR AND WITHOUT BOMBS DROPPING ALL AROUND THEM.

I've watched that overhyped piece of turd, so I feel at least somewhat qualified to comment on it.

If Moore-on was so intent on accurately portraying Iraqi life before the war, then why didn't he show the jailed/tortured/murdered dissidents? Or the rape rooms? Speaking of which, why didn't he interview any of the women who were unfortunate enough to catch Uday or Qusay's eye -- and live to tell about it ("it" being the brutal rapes they endured)?

What about those who spoke out -- or were just believed to have spoken out -- against Saddam Hussein's murderous regime, and got stuffed into plastic shredders, feet first?

Sheah, Saddam's Iraq was Disneyland on the Euphrates...

[WestVirginiaRebel]

Now, now-Saddam's palaces were very nice. /sarcasm

[GeorgeW23225]

You can't rationalize or debate intelligently with the unintelligent. Save your breath. They are hopeless.

No one in their right mind would defend a piece of propaganda trash like F9/11......