Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

About the "Ethics" of Armstrong Williams
NewsMax ^ | Jan. 7

Posted on 01/09/2005 3:16:06 AM PST by Anita1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Anita1
Article in full....


Media Targets Armstrong Williams

When one of the nation's few African American commentators takes the Republican side, expect him to become a target.

So it is with Armstrong Williams.

USA Today leads today, "Seeking to build support among black families for its education reform law, the Bush administration paid a prominent black pundit $240,000 to promote the law on his nationally syndicated television show, and to urge other black journalists to do the same."

The paper says the administration's public relations campaign was "part of an effort to promote No Child Left Behind (NCLB)," and that it "required commentator Armstrong Williams 'to regularly comment on NCLB during the course of his broadcasts,' and to interview Education Secretary Rod Paige for TV and radio spots that aired during the show in 2004."

A leading Congressional Democrat says the payments to Williams were "a very questionable use of taxpayers' money."

So what's the fuss about?

Williams, 45, is a former aide to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

An outspoken conservative, he hosts a syndicated TV show, The Right Side, and pens a syndicated column, carried in dozens of papers and on NewsMax.com.

Williams also runs his Washington-based public relations firm, Graham Williams Group.

His public relations firm also produces his TV show.

Though numerous syndicated TV programs - including ones on PBS - receive payments from guests and businesses as a form of advertisement without disclosure, the media is making much about the fact that Williams didn't disclose his public relations firm had received a payment to promote an issue.

Williams responds he was hiding nothing and readily admits he received the public relations contract.

He said he did so because he believes in the issue and that his show is part of his public relations work.

He also notes that his TV program has few advertisers and that this is an acceptable form of advertising.

On CNN Friday morning Bill Hemmer took Williams to task for "ethical questions" over not disclosing his public relations grant.

But other "ethical" issues were not raised on CNN, such as:

  • No mention was made on CNN of the frequent interviews of movie and TV stars on major networks, including CNN, where there is no dislosure of paid advertising. For example, major movie distribution firms buy advertisements on the same networks that also air the promotional interviews with such stars - with no disclosure whatsoever.

  • CBS's "60 Minutes" promoted several anti-Bush authors and books, including Richard Clarke's "Against All Enemies" - without disclosing that the publisher was Simon Schuster, a division of Viacom which also owns CBS.

  • The inappropriate use of taxpayer dollars for public broadcasting programs that serve as pure political propaganda. Bill Moyer's "Now" program is just one example.

41 posted on 01/10/2005 7:17:14 AM PST by ConservativeStLouisGuy (11th FReeper Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Unnecessarily Excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anita1
Williams should also have avoided hypocrisy. Last March he was questioning Richard Clarke's motives over 9/11 just because Clarke had a book out. At least Clarke's book deal was public. Williams has hurt himself, all conservative commentators, no child left behind, the public, and even liberal commentators. Everything looks more suspicious now.
42 posted on 01/10/2005 7:54:02 AM PST by Papa Cannabrew (No people can be great who have ceased to be virtuous. -- Samuel Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStLouisGuy
So what's the fuss about?

The fact that Williams profited from breaking the law. Duh.

43 posted on 01/11/2005 7:12:49 AM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Anita1

This is just the sort of thing one would expect from liberals: pass a huge new federal program, then use taxpayer money to sell the public on the need for the program. That anyone who claims to be conservative would sign on to this is outrageous. I don't know anything about Williams. I assume it was a solitary lapse of judgment. He should apologize, return the money, and then work to end federally-mandated education programs and return education back to the states.

Whoever in the Bush administration is responsible for buying off Williams should apologize to the taxpayers and pledge to never do it again. The Secretary of Education should declare NCLB is another unconstitutional intrusion by the all-knowing feds into the sovereignty of the states. The Bush administration should work with Congress to repeal NCLB and aplogize for the waste of taxpayer monies.


44 posted on 01/11/2005 8:09:08 AM PST by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson