To: blogbat
No problem. To be honest, I used to be bothered by the same stuff. Actually, the models of our most current aircraft (F-117, F-22, etc.) being made in China still bothers me.
At least we don't have a Commander-in-chief allowing missile, nuclear, satellite, etc. technologies to be more or less given to the Chicoms as we did a few years ago...at least, I don't think we do.
36 posted on
01/08/2005 6:22:23 PM PST by
GBA
To: GBA
"At least we don't have a Commander-in-chief allowing missile, nuclear, satellite, etc. technologies to be more or less given to the Chicoms as we did a few years ago...at least, I don't think we do."
That is for sure ;)
74 posted on
01/08/2005 7:13:56 PM PST by
blogbat
(Blogbat: ein Fahrgeschäft durch die Weltnachrichten)
To: GBA
Actually, the models of our most current aircraft (F-117, F-22, etc.) being made in China still bothers me. The models don't contain any more information about the capabilities of the aircraft, nor how it achieves them, than photographs. I'm sure they are made from photographs, not the engineering drawings.
91 posted on
01/08/2005 7:49:43 PM PST by
El Gato
(Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
To: GBA
At least we don't have a Commander-in-chief allowing missile, nuclear, satellite, etc. technologies to be more or less given to the Chicoms as we did a few years ago...at least, I don't think we do.Unfortunately, his wife sits on the Armed Services Committee to make sure that they can still sell info to the highest bidder for her '08 run.
170 posted on
01/10/2005 8:52:58 AM PST by
MattinNJ
(I thought we were in the tree of compassion and the nest of understanding-Frank the Tank)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson