Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockitz

When a sub runs aground with a water-cooled nuclear reactor, doesn't the reactor's cooling system start sucking mud into the reactor instead of sea water? I'm pretty sure mud doesn't have the same heat transfer and flow characteristics as sea water. I suspect there is a downplay of the threat to the reactor in this article.



Not the way the system works at all. Seawater and reactor plant completely isolated from each other. Can't go into details, but I will say have been nuc submariner the last 28 years.


473 posted on 01/08/2005 11:10:18 AM PST by Borntowade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]


To: Borntowade; Rockitz
Rockitz When a sub runs aground with a water-cooled nuclear reactor, doesn't the reactor's cooling system start sucking mud into the reactor instead of sea water? I'm pretty sure mud doesn't have the same heat transfer and flow characteristics as sea water. I suspect there is a downplay of the threat to the reactor in this article.

Not the way the system works at all. Seawater and reactor plant completely isolated from each other. Can't go into details, but I will say have been nuc submariner the last 28 years.

The systems are separate but the steam cycle is only about 35% efficient so if the propulsion and electrical generation systems are used, then that excess heat has to be removed. If the heat can't be removed, then the propulsion and electrical systems can't be used and the reactor system is of course reduced to a very low power or shutdown. Reactors have decay heat that must also be removed and a separate emergency cooling system is provided.

560 posted on 01/08/2005 2:55:45 PM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson