Skip to comments.
Nuclear Submarine Runs Aground South of Guam
The Associated Press ^
| Jan 8, 2005
| The Associated Press
Posted on 01/08/2005 3:19:47 AM PST by Jet Jaguar
HONOLULU (AP) - A nuclear submarine ran aground about 350 miles south of Guam, injuring several sailors, one of them critically, the Navy said.
There were no reports of damage to the USS San Francisco's reactor plant, which was operating normally, the Navy said.
Jon Yoshishige, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Fleet based at Pearl Harbor, said the Friday afternoon incident is under investigation and the 360-foot submarine was headed back to its home port in Guam.
Details on the sailors' injuries were not immediately available. The sub has a crew of 137, officials said.
Military and Coast Guard aircraft from Guam were en route to monitor the submarine and assist if needed, the Navy said.
Guam is a U.S. territory about 3,700 miles southwest of Hawaii.
---
On the Net:
U.S. Pacific Fleet: http://www.cpf.navy.mil
AP-ES-01-08-05 0343EST
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: guam; shipwreck; silentservice; ssn711; submarine; usn; usssanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,101-1,102 next last
To: mudblood
161
posted on
01/08/2005 6:14:06 AM PST
by
Boot Hill
(Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
To: jriemer
Chinese boats are getting more aggressive out there. It isnt out of the range of possibilities.
There is also underwater volcanic activity out there in that neck of the woods, if I remember correctly.
To: Doohickey
When were you on the 671?
163
posted on
01/08/2005 6:16:04 AM PST
by
deaconjim
(Freep the world!)
To: Boot Hill
To: Boot Hill
165
posted on
01/08/2005 6:16:08 AM PST
by
lemura
To: judicial meanz
I wonder what sort of mission she was on? 137 is an awfully big crew. There are only 108 bunks onboard.
166
posted on
01/08/2005 6:17:04 AM PST
by
Doohickey
("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
To: lemura
I was a sonarman....you do go active on the fathometer unless you are tracking....it is all on hardcopy....also, how do you think a sub navigates under ice?
To: Doohickey
To: mudblood
No military experience huh?
To: lemura
I had the same reaction as you two when I first saw that repsonse, but then I got to thinking (always a dangerous thing) that no one could be that dense as to refer to a novel when discussing a technical subject with obvious experts.Well, Dirk Pitt once said....
;-)
170
posted on
01/08/2005 6:18:38 AM PST
by
Quilla
To: chasio649
To: lemura
No idea what you're getting at.
--Boot
172
posted on
01/08/2005 6:18:52 AM PST
by
Boot Hill
(Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
To: deaconjim
It was in 1991. I was TAD there for the Med run while Batfish was in the yards.
173
posted on
01/08/2005 6:18:57 AM PST
by
Doohickey
("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
To: Doohickey
Sounds like weekly ops, if they just returned from WESTPAC on Dec 10.
We always hot-racked on weeklies. They were probably in hot racking heaven with that amount of crew
To: submarinerswife
For a deployment, yep. They'll put 18-24 racks down there for the nubs to sleep in.
175
posted on
01/08/2005 6:21:13 AM PST
by
Doohickey
("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
To: judicial meanz
I am sub qualified and a sub veteran. I was a crew member on a boat involver in a grounding incident. The CO during the incident was NOT relieved. However, that is all I can say in an open forum. Actually, that is all I can say in any forum.
176
posted on
01/08/2005 6:21:34 AM PST
by
Conservative Infidel
(There are only two types of ships - submarines and targets.)
To: Boot Hill
Your comment was a sincere response to try and direct the original poster to some factual information. My point was that the motives of anyone refering to a novel as a basis for debate should be suspect.
177
posted on
01/08/2005 6:22:35 AM PST
by
lemura
To: judicial meanz
I was never in the PAC, so I don't know if they have a PAC equivalent of AUTEC where boats go to do TRE.
178
posted on
01/08/2005 6:22:44 AM PST
by
Doohickey
("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
To: judicial meanz
I still miss the guys...and its been a few years
I know how you feel there, expecally with being back here in Groton, with my wife on shore duty. I keep looking at all the sources to see if my old boats are having a reunion.
I did get one concelation..the Cheif who live across the street from us was a "C" school student of mine back in 89 *L*
179
posted on
01/08/2005 6:24:16 AM PST
by
Bottom_Gun
(Crush depth dummy)
To: Doohickey
Cool picture on your home page. I'm curious, how are subs climate controlled?
180
posted on
01/08/2005 6:25:18 AM PST
by
Quilla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,101-1,102 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson