Nice of him to take the fall and all that, but how can it be his fault while not being the fault of whoever paid him off? This could get embarassing and doesn't help advance our agenda at all, especially if it was policy and not some isolated act of stupidity by a lower level functionary. I hope it was the former and not the latter.
I think what you guys say is correct. Since he is a pundit and NOT a journalist than nothing was tech wrong with it but because it acts as such, well it just shows poor judgement on both parts than anything else. They can use PR but you don't want it too look like you were paying news people which he is not but he acknowledged that since he has radio and does appearances that it could be taken that way......in other words get out there now, expose yourself and leave no room or the Dems to do it....deflate the issue before it rises
That should be "latter and not the former"