[dennisw]

A unprovoked nuclear attack against Mecca would go down as one of the vilest, evil acts ever foisted against mankind.....

Please use your reading comprehension skills. 99% of the posters here are talking about a provoked attack from Muhammedans, as does the author. What would you classify as a provoked attack? Large scale American deaths due to bio weapons or nuclear blast?

[broadsword]

I guess a world-wide, bloodthirsty, Islamic assault on human civilization is not provocation enough.

Should we wait until the last infidel throat is slit?

Would that satisfy them?

[APFel]

Please use your reading comprehension skills. Please do not insult me. I read every word in this thread and I understand them perfectly. Perhaps if you read what I wrote, you would understand that I was writing about a nuclear attack against a city with no military value in an allied land.

Maybe I should write that again, because clearly those people who have needlessly attacked me in this thread for not being a cheerleader for the inane "NUKE MECCA" movement here on FR don't quite understand.

Here it is again. This time in italics: I was writing about a nuclear attack against a city with no military value in an allied land.

Not only would it be seen as an attack against Islam, it would be seen as an attack against a civilian target in an allied nation-state done sheerly out of malice and spite for the actions of an NGO.

Bah. I'm not going to bother anymore. You guys can have your nuclear dreams and geopolitical fantasies. If you need me, I'll be over here in the real world.

APf