Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tamar1973
So couples who have infertility issues don't have a "valid, natural marriage" either?!

The difference is intent. Infertile couples aren't infertile by choice.

There's also the category of people past the child-bearing age who get married. For some of these people, it's better for society, and for them, to get married rather than to become "dirty old men" (or women). As St. Paul said:

1 Corinthians 7:8-9

Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.


666 posted on 01/04/2005 11:07:32 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan
The difference is intent. Infertile couples aren't infertile by choice.

I would submit to you that those couples who are "infertile by choice" are doing the world a favor and rather than being called names such as "selfish", they should be thanked for not bringing children into the world who would be treated as an inconvenience or even resented. The last thing this world needs is another neglected, resented child growing up to be a mass murderer or something. No child deserves to be raised like that.

675 posted on 01/04/2005 12:47:24 PM PST by Tamar1973 (Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats-- PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson