Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan
Really? What about couples who decide to have only one child, or two? These people are of the same mindset, and their numbers are not statistically insignificant. We are now below replacement level, excluding immigrants.

It's not really a concern, either way. As of 1999, the American fertility rate was 2.08 children per women, which is just a whisker below replacement levels.

There are indications that the American fertility rate is in the process of increasing slightly.

So, we're basically at replacement levels, maybe a bit under. We can certainly make up the shortfall, if any, with smart immigration. Currently, our high immigration rates mean that the American population is growing at above replacement levels. So, we could cut immigration substantially and still be at replacement level.

Other than paying for welfare programs, there is no reason to expand the American population.

422 posted on 01/03/2005 12:06:05 PM PST by Modernman (What is moral is what you feel good after. - Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]


To: Modernman
there is no reason to expand the American population.

Ever seen "Scrooge"?

645 posted on 01/04/2005 8:30:08 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson