Your sarcastic remark may actually be the premis of Mr homo-advocate Wolf's article. His premise is that marriage is FORCED to be about children which it should only be about consenting adults who love entering into a contract based on love and sex. Did I metion the love and sex?
This is not about the people who decide not to have children. Mr Wolf is endevoring to push childless marriage as the norm to support his homosexual marriage causes.
We should be focusing less on why an individual normal couple makes the decision and focus more on why marriage AS AN INSTITTUION is centered on children. As FR we need to go deeper into a article and the author than mere surface anecdotes. What is this guy's bias? Why only anecdotes? (classic homo-advocacy writing BTW, just happy happy anecdotes)
Well said.
Liberals have a habit of using rare exceptions to prove what they think should be the norm for everyone.