Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
Thus far the BCS has stated that they plan to make no changes for next season. They think the BCS is working fine.

As far as consensus #1 & #2 it is only because that's where they were ranked preseason and did not lose.

`There are two national championship games,'' Tuberville insisted. ``There's one here at the Sugar Bowl, and there's another one at the Orange Bowl.''

I can understand that sounds self promoting, but in the bragging rights department when it comes to recruiting, especially in the SEC, that can carry some weight.

And lastly, yes I am biased since I'm an Auburn grad. It's been too many years since we've even been this close and to run the table in the SEC and not even get an opportunity is a 1st with an SEC team.

29 posted on 01/03/2005 10:18:23 AM PST by Reaganomics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Reaganomics

One of the reasons that Auburn should get a shot at the NC is they came from way behind to do it. Was Auburn ranked at the beginning of the season? VT was not.


30 posted on 01/03/2005 10:21:49 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganomics
The BCS is considering changes. Weiberg: BCS kicking around selection options

I'm not sure why the AP Poll will no longer be considered, but it seems to me that it increases the odds of a truly split championship.

31 posted on 01/03/2005 10:25:41 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson