Replies

"My only embarrassing moment in recent memory was being forced to admit to a friend ..that the people I support who want to teach the 200 year old racist / sexist religious beliefs of Charles Darwin in the schools were not children."

And rightly so.

"Evolutionists who assert things like this are kooks who should not be listened to: "... at no very distant date..an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world", and "the chief distinction in the intellectual powers of the two sexes is shown by man's attaining to a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can a woman - whether requiring deep thought, reason or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. ... We may also infer ...[that] the average of mental power in man must be above that of a woman". ~ Charles Darwin

"No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average Negro is the equal, still less the superior, of the white man... It is simply incredible [to think] that ... he will be able to successfully with his bigger-brained and smaller-jawed rival, in a contest which is to be carried on by thoughts and not bites." ~ Thomas Huxley Darwin's best student - and the man most responsible for advancing macroevolution (Darwinianism)"

"If the unfit survived indefinately, they would continure to infect the fit with their genes. The result is that the more fit genes would be diluted and compromised by the less fit genes and evolution could not take place. The concept of evolution demands death. Death is thus as natural to evolution as it is foreign to biblical creation. The Bible teaches that death is a foreigner, a condition superimposed upon humans and nature after creation." ~ Darwinist / macroevolutionist, Marvin Lubenow."

I agree. They should not be listened to, nor should their ideas be taught to impressionable school children.

"... every Darwinist does argue from an unproven and unprovable premise: that something can come out of nothing. That takes "Darwinianism" out of the realm of science and into the realm of blind faith religion. If you want to have a theological debate, that's one thing. But don't assert that evolution is factually correct ...and don't force the state to spread that doctrine in schools.

I agree.

"You simply don't know what the hell you are talking about. ... It's called talking out of your ass."

Whaaaat??? I was just agreeing with you. Hahahaha

Oh, man, that was such a pathetic response...

So, let's see, you don't want to teach the science of evolution because you find Darwin's views on race and sex to be offense? Nice ad hominem attack. Don't teach the science of evolution in schools because English society during the Victorian Era held distasteful views on women and black people--your powers of reasoning are breathtaking.

Marvin Lubenow is not a "Darwinist/macroevolutionist". He is a creationist. It shows the absolute bankruptcy of your position that you have to lie about him to support your ridiculous argument. Who are you going to cite next, the famed evolutionary biologist Duane Gish??

"... every Darwinist does argue from an unproven and unprovable premise: that something can come out of nothing.

Wrong. Typical ill-informed creationist crap. Evolution doesn't require "something from nothing". It is about descent with modification. Even abiogenesis doesn't require "something from nothing".

That takes "Darwinianism" out of the realm of science and into the realm of blind faith religion. If you want to have a theological debate, that's one thing. But don't assert that evolution is factually correct ...and don't force the state to spread that doctrine in schools.

Again, you are talking out of your ass. The science of evolution is based on the millions of data points that support the theory. That is not science, not religion.

And the creationist tactic to assert that evolution and creationism are equally scientific or equally religious is as tiresome as it is mendacious.

Religion is when you reject the scientific data, or make meaningless distinctions like "macroevolution" and "microevolution", or waste your time arguing between the mutually ridiculous contentions such as "young earth" versus "old earth", all because you think your faith is threatened by evolution.