I have asked these questions of a number of creationists, and I have yet to get any answers. Perhaps you will accommodate me.
(1) What is the goal when you (and I use "you" collectively here to denote creationists in general) fabricate a fictional attribute of evolutionary theory, and then dismiss the theory because the fictional attribute has not been, and indeed cannot be, supported by evidence?
(2) Do you think it would be appropriate to use this technique of fabricating non-existence attributes when teaching evolutionary theory in the classroom?
(3) If yes to (2), then how would you reconcile Biblical admonitions against dishonesty with a deliberate dissemination of false information to unsuspecting students?
Well if you read my initial post you would see that I don't attempt to explain creation.
Instead, I suggest that creationists focus on exposing the lack of science associated with explaining evolution.
post 191 tried to overwhelm with a volume of print.
When the volume is examined , it fails.
Where are the pic's of the supposed fossils of one species in transition to another?
Giving a latin name to a series, and assert one begat the other is falacious.