Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darkwolf377

No but pollster brother said that Kerry lost more than Bush won. Kerry never defined himself. (I laught out loud at that one, kerry defined himself over 30 years. Kerry was a known quantity when the democrats were panting "eeeeeelectability.")


15 posted on 12/28/2004 9:17:22 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
Kerry certainly defined himself. People knew who he was--Vietnam vet, liberal, senator. I'm not making a wisecrack, that's who he is, period, it's how he's defined himself for decades.

He got a lot of votes, but more voted for Bush. It's that simple. The Zogborg is just trying to make it sound so complex so people will think "Wow, we need people like him to figure this stuff out for us!"

18 posted on 12/28/2004 9:20:01 PM PST by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: longtermmemmory

Somewhere around here are figures that Bush increased the number voting for him by over 10 million. Kerry increased over Gore's percentages by around 12%. G.W. over his 2000 totals by over 20%. Evidently Zogby prefers to ignore the facts that state otherwise.

So rich that it is now the war that won Bush the election. Zogby was of opinion this was a liability.

If Evangelicals were akin to the Taliban than Zogby wouldn't have been allowed on TV to cite this propaganda.

One of the many blessings this past election was that Zogby's reputation was rightly discredited. he was shown as the partisan hack he genuinely is, manipulating polls at will in attempt to shape public opinion against G.W.


20 posted on 12/28/2004 9:23:50 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson