[nosofar]

...hundreds of ballots had been mistakenly rejected ...

Dean Logan, the county's elections director and one of three members on its canvassing board, said those ballots would not be re-evaluated because they had been properly considered and rejected.

Let me see if I understand this. First, ballots which had been 'mistakenly' rejected were recounted. Later, when the GOP submitted the mentioned affidavits, we get the position that they would the ballots would not be re-evaluated because they had been 'properly considered and rejected'. I'd be curious as to what that last phrase meant. If the were rejected, how do they know they were 'properly considered' and not 'mistakenly' rejected without re-evaluating them?

[ThisLittleLightofMine]

The bigger question is why all counties in WA state aren't required by law to certify their official results by the same date. It seems an unfair advantage that King county has not been required to certify their ballots as timely as other counties. I have serious concerns that ballot wasn't counted in Clark County, due to the fact that my signature has changed since I originally registered (decades ago). What can I do as a citizen of Clark County WA to make sure my ballot was counted???