Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Logical me

There is a legal (see financial) reason for priviledge not right.

A right requires far more civil rights be accomodated. Jurry trials, public defenders, prosecutors (some municipalities do not even use prosecutors), court reporting and so on.

Since this "priviledge" is not a right and is generally a civil infraction with only money being the penalty, the governments can collect cash without incurring the expense of a full blown court system.


58 posted on 12/23/2004 9:40:49 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
"Since this "privilege" is not a right and is generally a civil infraction with only money being the penalty, the governments can collect cash without incurring the expense of a full blown court system."

Which is EXACTLY the problem. You see, if they had to operate under the reality that you and I have a right to use public roads, well, let's just say that would take the profit out of the whole scam, wouldn't it?

Nik
121 posted on 12/25/2004 3:13:56 PM PST by Nik Naym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson