Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bruinbirdman; blam; Jeremiah Jr; Quix; concretebob; dighton; aculeus; Lijahsbubbe; dennisw
This title brought something back to mind that oddly, isn't the first reminder this week. Somewhere I had this stuff stored on another computer, but time flies, things get moved around, blah blah. Anyway it seems like a good time to look it up again.

A couple of years ago, I was Googling info about Hebrew inscriptions in America. One link led to another, and after looking at various alphabet charts, this item in particular caught my attention:

"Maine amulet with unusal symbols. On the other side is an eye of God -- an Old World motif."

LINK

I snooped around on the web, but it seemed that nobody who studied this amulet, knew what the symbols meant. Now maybe that's changed but I don't have the time to re-research. So I'll continue from memory (plus a little luck with image searches).

When I saw the image, it reminded me of these symbols:

One set is from Los Lunas, the other from Tel Dan. Here's the link:

http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/15_home.html

Now if you compare the symbols on the amulet, it appears that the first line of script (right to left) contains the following letters:

bet, zayin, yud, vav

I know very little about Hebrew but I like to dabble, and I enjoy word puzzles. So looking at that I read "b'ziv"; IOW, in [the month of] Ziv.

Also, the image to me suggested a reference to an eclipse or some such celestial event. The two circles at the top looked like those full moon and new moon symbols on a calendar. The "face" with the horns or rays could be the sun, if the astronomical symbolism is correct. Not sure what the "mouth" is below the two top circles, but perhaps it depicts a connection or relationship between the two circles and/or the larger circle with the four horns or rays (perhaps suggestive of a compass rose).

On to those bottom two "x"s. They looked to me like two tavs. The dot below the second tav (reading right to left), and/or the dash before both of them, may differentiate these tavs from the other letters. Perhaps the tavs represent a number (800, 400 + 400), instead of a word. I reasoned this because of the modern day practice of inserting apostrophes in letter sequences, so the letters are understood as numbers or abbreviations, instead of a word.

Far-fetched? Where did that leave me? I wondered if like today, the 800 is representative of a Hebrew year ending in 800, such as 3800 or 4800. The year now is 5765, and I've seen on calendars where the year is abbreviated to the last three digits.

Okay, so if I am on to something, the amulet marks an eclipse in the month of Ziv in a year 800.

Ziv = Zif

02099 Ziv {zeev'}
probably from an unused root meaning to be prominent; TWOT - 533; n pr m

AV - Zif 2; 2

Zif = "brightness"
1) name of the 2nd month of the year, corresponding to Apr-May

I realize that the month is normally spelled zayin vav (no yud), but the root (meaning "radiance", "brightness") is spelled zayin yud vav, so this isn't necessarily a poor hunch. The big test is that eclipse, in the spring of a year "800". Are eclipses that common that I should find one anyway, no matter what the amulet really means? Perhaps, but a visit to Fred Espenak's eclipse page reveals:

a total lunar eclipse in AD 40 (Hebrew year 3800) on May 15th, saros series 70. I have no clue where this eclipse would have been visible from (I had figured it out way back when, the instructions are on the page).

http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/LEcat/LEcatalog.html

 

I also checked years -960/2800 (no year zero), and 1040/4800, but there weren't any eclipses in April or May.

I checked for solar eclipses also. There was a partial on April 29 in the same year, AD 40.

Perhaps the amulet speaks of that particular month, which was heralded by a solar eclipse and marked in the center by a lunar eclipse. Ironically, this during a month which means "brightness".

Coincidence? It is just a few hunches thrown together with a few tidbits of knowledge. Otherwise, what's an amulet doing in Maine with Hebrew writing, describing eclipses from AD 40?

FWIW

25 posted on 12/22/2004 9:07:28 PM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bruinbirdman; blam; Jeremiah Jr; Quix; concretebob; dighton; aculeus; Lijahsbubbe; dennisw

Ooops, "no year zero" should read "note: year zero". That is, -960 is calculated with a zero, and would correspond to 961 BC.


26 posted on 12/22/2004 9:32:09 PM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Thinkin' Gal

VERY interesting. Thanks!


29 posted on 12/22/2004 10:18:59 PM PST by Quix (5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Grig; Choose Ye This Day; Utah Girl; Thinkin' Gal

Should be interesting to watch this for future reference!

3 And the judge received for his wages according to his time—a senine of gold for a day, or a senum of silver, which is equal to a senine of gold; and this is according to the law which was given.

4 Now these are the names of the different pieces of their gold, and of their silver, according to their value. And the names are given by the Nephites, for they did not reckon after the manner of the Jews who were at Jerusalem; neither did they measure after the manner of the Jews; but they altered their reckoning and their measure, according to the minds and the circumstances of the people, in every generation, until the reign of the judges, they having been established by king Mosiah..

5 Now the reckoning is thus—a senine of gold, a seon of gold, a shum of gold, and a limnah of gold.

6 A senum of silver, an amnor of silver, an ezrom of silver, and an onti of silver. 7 A senum of silver was equal to a senine of gold, and either for a measure of barley, and also for a measure of every kind of grain.

8 Now the amount of a seon of gold was twice the value of a senine.

9 And a shum of gold was twice the value of a seon.

10 And a limnah of gold was the value of them all.

11 And an amnor of silver was as great as two senums.

12 And an ezrom of silver was as great as four senums.

13 And an onti was as great as them all.

14 Now this is the value of the lesser numbers of their reckoning—

15 A shiblon is half of a senum; therefore, a shiblon for half a measure of barley.

16 And a shiblum is a half of a shiblon.

17 And a leah is the half of a shiblum.

18 Now this is their number, according to their reckoning.

19 Now an antion of gold is equal to three shiblons.


36 posted on 12/22/2004 11:03:06 PM PST by restornu (KNEEL TO HEAVEN WITH IT ALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Thinkin' Gal

interesting post.

http://www.ancientscripts.com/ws_atoz.html


44 posted on 04/04/2005 11:28:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Friday, March 25, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


Nice post by Thinkin' Gal. This is just an update to the ping message.
Archeological Riddle, Science Frontiers #67, Jan-Feb 1990, William R. Corliss

Archeological Riddle, Science Frontiers #67, Jan-Feb 1990, William R. Corliss

49 posted on 07/07/2013 8:38:06 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson