It has been wryly suggested to me that I'm not giving the opposition adequate time to absorb the materials presented as evidence against its position. I have to wonder if the humor was intentional.
RussP wrote:
I didn't follow the link, but I will stipulate for the sake of argument that your link does indeed document such mutations.
VadeRetro replied:
It has been wryly suggested to me that I'm not giving the opposition adequate time to absorb the materials presented as evidence against its position. I have to wonder if the humor was intentional.
RussP replies:
Point 1: I'm honest about it.
Point 2: Consider the logic of your reply: "Because you did not read my link, you are ignorant." Well, I want to know if you read Spetner's book -- and Behe's too, by the way. Honestly, now.
Point 3: You focused on a minor point of my reply, and you ignored the main point. What is the ratio (even approximately) of beneficial to harmful mutations? And why do evolutionists never seem to discuss that? Is that unimportant in their little world?
That would require measuring time in geological eras.