[puroresu]

Yeah, I've heard that Nobel argument before. However, since the debate has been defined to exclude any possibility of God, it's a hollow argument. You're basically saying, "Come up with a better theory than evolution that doesn't rely on God".

Sorry. Can't be done. If God doesn't exist, then evolution is the best explanation for how life on earth came to be. It's the best thing anyone can come up with under those circumstances.


So we're stuck here like a broken record, arguing day in and day out.

[Dimensio]

If God doesn't exist, then evolution is the best explanation for how life on earth came to be.

Why does the existence or lack thereof of deities relate to this? The evidence points to evolution whether or not a god exists. Now, if you want to argue that the evidence is misleading because a supernatural god entity intervened, then fine, but don't pretend that it's science or that it has a place in science classrooms.

[larryav8r]

Therein lies the rub. Excellent point.

[Quix]

Actually, the globalists have a replacement for evolution waiting in the wings:

PANSPERMIA or some variation thereof. I doubt they'll trot it out until the UFO stuff is more overtly publicized officially.

But it fits in well with the globalists goal of setting up an evil world government.

"Science" indeed. It's turned into something more akin to the black arts within my lifetime. Sad, that.

[RichardMoore]

I'm sorry, the problem is worse than that. If God does not exist then the universe cannot explain itself and we are left with something that has no explaination. How could all of this come from nothing? Evolution does not explain that. And it is the ultimate question. If you say there was a big bang then I would say what caused that? If you say some gases I would say were did they come from. Ultimately Aquinas explained these questions and evolutionist are looking into the sand for their own answers.