Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re; Alamo-Girl; marron; PatrickHenry
I should point out, in addition, that suggesting that the universe may not require a God is not the same as suggesting that the universe doesn't have a God.

But how do you expect science to show that the universe either does or does not require a God? That's a pretty tall order, general_re. Frankly, I don't think this is a scientific question at all. One must run on over to the other side of the great epistemic divide (e.g., to philosphy, cosmology, theology) just to ask it.

My best wishes to you and yours for a Happy New Year!

1,378 posted on 12/31/2004 7:28:14 PM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1312 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop
But how do you expect science to show that the universe either does or does not require a God?

It all began with that atheist Newton and his laws of motion, which denied the God keep pushing the arrow continuously in flight.

I shouldn't have to point this out, but asserting that things behave in consistent ways over time does not deny God, even though it sometimes denies the need to assume miracles in everyday life.

If you assume miracle as the default explanation for an unknown phenomena, you cannot do science, because science has the opposite default assumption.

1,380 posted on 12/31/2004 7:35:35 PM PST by js1138 (D*mn, I Missed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1378 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson