Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
Didn't we discuss embryonic gills a year or two ago - how does this play in? or would this be via some preliminary organ duplication in proto-land animals? Just spitballin' - balrog
39 posted on 12/21/2004 4:54:03 PM PST by balrog666 (The invisible and the nonexistent look very much alike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: balrog666

"I established the opposite view, that this history of the embryo (ontogeny) must be completed by a second, equally valuable, and closely connected branch of thought - the history of race (phylogeny). Both of these branches of evolutionary science, are, in my opinion, in the closest causal connection; this arises from the reciprocal action of the laws of heredity and adaptation... 'ontogenesis is a brief and rapid recapitulation of phylogenesis, determined by the physiological functions of heredity (generation) and adaptation (maintenance).'"
Haeckel, E. 1899. Riddle of the Universe at the Close of the Nineteenth Century.

The gill hypothesis tends to uphold Haeckel. For years scientists and their critics have denied that it is true. However, the creationists are overly critical of Haeckel and do not understand the nuance we see in developing embryos, that does present some evidence for evolution.

Haeckel was a great scientist and a genius.


105 posted on 12/21/2004 6:25:59 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson