Time for all the hetero gay men to check in.
That's not funny, Askel.
We went to great lengths to preserve Barney Frank as OFFICIAL GAY GUY and even had one of our own "out" himself as fence-hopping Dem to drive the point home.
Posted on 12/21/2004 11:58:20 AM PST by tellw
Which is the more manly man, your opinion?
The guy who smacks his lips, wolf whistles, honks his horn and gesticulates each time a "piece of ass" walks by ... as if he's got no more self-control than a sunflower turning to the sun or a herd of cattle swinging their heads, en masse, toward the dinner bell.
or
The guy who says nothing (but gets his point across anyway) and maybe even kisses you passionately but holds off until the time is right ... regardless how weak are your knees or trembling is your lip?
(I'll take No. 2, thanks.)
I realize the way things have been warped, it's now considered "manly" to gawk at Girls Gone Wild like fags at Oz on dance night or some Fire Island bash but it's Self-Control that is the truly manly and irresistible quality.
Personally, I find the whole porn scene quite gay. I realize that's a mindbender for most "redblooded males" but having been immersed in the gay culture as long as I have been, some things are patently obvious to me. It's like watching all the young boys from Flyover Country showing up to tour the Quarter with their parents wearing the hairstyles all the fashion queens were wearing five years ago. Same with chicks wearing nightie tops in public lately. That was old five years ago.
Bottom line ... I see nothing strong or powerful or particularly "manly" about a guy who's putty in the hands of any chick wearing a thong ... letting it all hang out (a la Rosa above) or going the more pedestrian route which is wearing cheap, unlined garmets through which everyone can inspect whatever tired underwear you've been sitting on all day long.
It strikes me as juvenile at best, and gay at worst. Face it, one reason homosexuals are so intent on overturning the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy is because indeed they are seeking respect for the fact they define themselves PRIMARILY by their aberrant sexuality.
Hetero men who do the same are kinda gay, IMHO, for that very reason. If you've got to broadcast it, chances are there's no point in tuning in at all.
Like the rim of blue around a dove's (or sometimes a parrot's) eyes you mean? I'll bet that's what you're talking about.
Fair enough. I think she'd be better off in something with a little more oomph than dove grey, though.
=== What is "f'me-pump"?
[rolls eyes]
As if women living in a day and age where the President's daughters desire "slinky and sexy, figure-hugging with slits and sequins and decolletage" for Daddy's Inauguration need to ask ...
I realize we've already had a little nudity on the thread and all but I still think spelling out the moniker would be bad form on a First Lady Fashion thread.
=== Anyone who's seen that accidental photo of Big Dick Cheney knows why some of them do.
BTW ... is this something along the lines of Gore's canoe shot or what?
D'ecolletage \D['e]`col`le*tage"\ (d[=a]`k[-o]`l'*t[.a]zh), n.
[F. See D['e]collet['e].] (Costume)
The upper border or part of a d['e]collet['e] corsage.
From WordNet (r) 2.0 :
decolletage
n : a low-cut neckline on a woman's dress
=== The last thing I want is a bunch of perverts leering over the first lady. That privilege is for her husband.
No problem-o.
We still got the two daughters ... they ain't jailbait or nuttin'. Hubba hubba!! Bring on the Gown Malfunctions!
LOL - yeah, spelling it out would be "bad form". Ay ay ay...
Time for all the hetero gay men to check in.
Askel, you really should stick to baking cookies.
I asked you explain what you meant about the comment about people trying to "pretend they are Italian", and you come back with this 9 paragraph spiel which makes even less sense to me than the comment I was asking you to explain.
I think you just like to hear yourself talk, and the words just flow out of your mouth on any tanget that you can grab a hold of.
This thread started about what dress Laura Bush will wear to the Inaugural and now you've moved into men gesticulting when they see a woman walk by.
Oh, and Askel? I don't EVEN want to know how it is you got to be "immersed in the gay culture as long as I have been,". Maybe if you get out of that "immersion" you can find a REAL man.
Gay guys don't want to bed/wed women. (Just a little free tip from me to you).
Correction:
I think you Just Like to hear yourself talk, and the words just Flow out of your mouth on any Tanget that you can grab a hold Of.
There. That's better.
You're missing the point entirely.
"Straight males" (on a "conservative site") who defend drooling over the President's daughters are somewhat sleazier than Peter Pan even if they aren't exactly gay.
What is "manly" about joining the Tiger Beat "Daily Dose" crowd to oooh and aaah over a couple of chickies who are barely out of school and not exactly drop-dead gorgeous in the same way that ... say ... the buck-naked boy-toy style slut Rose McGowan is.
=== Gay guys don't want to bed/wed women. (Just a little free tip from me to you).
David Souter might have got round it but I assure you there are plenty of Log Cabin sorts for whom -- like those on this thread -- Appearance matters a great deal.
Well, how the HELL could THAT have happened?
Decolletage means the appearance of cleavage, correct?
You ever looked at the leadership with the Gaydar set to "ON"?
ROTFLMAO
So, just for the record then Askel, you consider comments about the Bush Twins to be "drooling" and any "conservative" straight men who do that or defend that are sleazier than Peter Pan? Since when is Peter Pan "SLEAZY"??????
You are such a card!!
I'm amazed to still find you on this thread; heretofore, you've always sneered at the women posters on this site for any mention of the fashion world.
I think someone feels like they have to compete with the Bush twins, hence the catty remarks aimed in their direction. < /psychoanalysis >
Well, no, not really. I mean I am not immersed in the gay community; I don't study them and I am not attracted to them and I CERTAINLY am not "LOOKING" for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.