Obviously, you are a proponent of degrading our efforts in Iraq.
No replacement could fit Rumsfelds shoes in what he has accomplished in these dire times however, the shouts from the media for his removal is apparently effective in guaranteeing a degraded performance in Iraq for the likes of YOU are falling for it.
What could be more "degrading" to our efforts in Iraq than a Secretary of Defense who won't spend a few seconds for each letter to personally sign his condolences to the families of the valiant soldiers killed for his policy? I KNOW you'd all be screaming if Clinton's people showed this total lack of caring and did this, I certainly WOULD -- lets show some consistencey, its only a few seconds of his precious time for the families of those who gave up their entire lives, often at the age of 18 or 19.
...and it took a lot of money to fill his big mouth, but he did it...
I can argue with the shill for the asgard, because we're "family" now, but if you do, you should know him as a terrific American I am honored to think of as a friend.
Obviously, you are an idiot. I served honorably for over 10 years and I reject your blithering comment. Where did YOU serve?
No replacement could fit Rumsfelds shoes in what he has accomplished in these dire times however, the shouts from the media for his removal is apparently effective in guaranteeing a degraded performance in Iraq for the likes of YOU are falling for it.
Nobody would be calling for Rumsfeld's head if he wasn't actually DOING stupid stuff like this (or, not doing it as the case may be). And I would like to see you deny that you would not be doing the same thing if a Secretary of Defense during the Clinton administration had done (or not done) the same thing.
Your trying to s--t against the wind pal the left wing nuts are out in force. I would like to here about some of their time in the service.