It's a good article, but IMHO, far too hasty in generalization to merit qualification as decent science. Educated? yes,..proved verity,..not shown, IMHO.
For example, the hasty generalizations regarding the 'time machine' rather than expressing that model in exponential mathematics and identifying the expressions with intended meanings, following the logic step by step until checking the verifiability (if even possible) of such systemic use of functionals, the author simply lists a litany of arguments and counterarguments which might very well appear to be confirmed by exponentials, when the transforms themselves might actually beg the question of the ancient dates ascribed to the events from their arguments,..a circular reasoning fallacy might very well exist in these dating methods.